Letters to the Editor

Coal logic faulty

In his letter (The News, April 10), Alf Randall makes the classic, tiresome argument that to oppose the Raven Coal Mine one must abandon all trappings of modern life: cars, houses and so on.

The point that Mr. Randall misses is that we are not arguing for an end to modern industrial life. Rather, we are arguing for our society to transition to a sustainable modern industrial life.

No one I know wants to deny young families a comfortable future. Indeed, our concern for the future of our children is probably one of the largest motivations for our activism. The continued mining of coal will, without a doubt, cause mind-boggling environmental, economic and agricultural upheavals.

How comfortable will young families be when it is no longer possible to grow wheat in Saskatchewan or when the glaciers feeding the waterways in most of Asia have melted away? Personally, I oppose any further coal mining anywhere on the planet, not just in the Comox Valley.

How will we move forward as an industrial society without coal?  I’m not in a position to say. But I have no doubt that once we make a decision based on the well being of the earth as a whole, rather than the profits of a few, we’ll figure it out rather quickly.

Mike Mesford

 

Fanny Bay

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Mourning Parksville boxing mentor
 
Qualicum Beach man fears for future of big, old tree on the beach
 
Bank shears off in a flow of mud

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.