Skip to content

Prudent for the public to rely on more rigorous evidence

Re: ‘Weather disasters are not new’ (Letters, PQB News , June 6)
17215651_web1_PQN-Letters

Re: ‘Weather disasters are not new’ (Letters, PQB News, June 6)

Mr. Greir fails to identify what informs his expertise in climate change other than “35 years” of self study and “discussions” with scientists.

As commendable as it may be to have devoted his time to this inquiry, I think it is prudent for the public to rely on more rigorous evidence pertaining to such a serious matter.

To persist in denying the human contribution to climate change (“humans have nothing to do with climate change”) in the face of internationally agreed upon science smacks of the indoctrination that he fears is affecting the youth today.

Time is limited. The evidence is in. To suggest that the international scientific consensus regarding climate change represents a massive conspiracy defies all logic.

Chris Nokleby

Qualicum Beach