Coal not so bad

Communities foul waters far more than any coal mine ever will

Mr. Snyder in his letter of rebuttal (The News, Mar. 23), suggests that the old Union Bay coal loading area is a moonscape.  Well I beg to differ.

I have driven past that site for many years and occasionally walked through the area and all you ever see is a lush green landscape with the occasional relic of the past.

Such sites are often preserved for historical interest such as we see in Cumberland.   I have seen natural landscapes that look not much different from this so called moonscape.

Yes absolutely there is coal residue underlying the site and in the waters adjacent. It certainly has not stopped the growth of vegetation.

Nor has this coal harmed the shellfish of the area, as the industry has thrived for many years without any signs of contamination.

In fact coal and charcoal (which is probably also on this site) has been used for water filtration and purification.

There is much more coal residue left on the Union Bay site than would ever enter the sound from the Raven Coal mine.

I submit to you that the industries working on the waters of the sound and industrial areas and private residences surrounding the sound, along with huge volumes of runoff from Courtenay and Comox, are a much greater contamination hazard to the shellfish industry than anything the Raven mine might ever inflict on the area.

Alf Randall


Qualicum Beach



Be Among The First To Know

Sign up for a free account today, and receive top headlines in your inbox Monday to Saturday.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.

Don't have an account? Click here to sign up
Pop-up banner image