EDITORIAL: Debating public/private water systems

Many things work well when handled by the private sector, but we're not so sure a water system should be one of those

They are mad as hell and they aren’t going to take it anymore.

OK, that may be a bit of an exaggeration, but there’s no doubt members of the French Creek Residents’ Association are not happy with their water service provider and they are doing something rather serious about it.

A rate increase of more than 33 per cent last year has partly fuelled the movement. The Epcor water customers in French Creek pay about $162 every three months for their water. They can walk a few minutes to visit their neighbours who are on the Qualicum Beach system, who pay about half that every three months.

Epcor, owned by the City of Edmonton, builds guaranteed profit into its water rates. Now, regular readers of this space know we don’t believe profit is a dirty word. The bigger question here is whether water systems should be privately owned.

One could make an argument for just about anything being privatized. Education, health care, bridges, roads, you name it. Many people won’t agree with the arguments for full privatization of these key pillars of society, but reasonable arguments can be made nonetheless.

We’re not sure that’s the case for water.

Sure, there are government standards to follow and a government comptroller for appeals on water rates (that didn’t work out so well for French Creek residents), but that somehow doesn’t instill confidence when it comes to water.

Think about how much you use water, how much you take it for granted. We wash, we drink, we flush many times a day. In fact, we (Canadians) are some of the heaviest users of water in the world, consuming roughly 250 litres per person a day drinking, washing, flushing, etc. Germans use about 120 litres a day. Many in Africa must get by on 20 litres a day. The United Nations says a human being needs 50 litres a day.

Companies, by their very nature, can put profit ahead of almost anything else. That’s not a bad thing, generally. It creates jobs and wealth and more jobs and more taxes to pay for things like public health care and education.

For safety, conservation and accountability reasons, we don’t believe water belongs in that private-company-profit sphere, but it’s up to the people of French Creek to make their own determination.

— Editorial by John Harding

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Qualicum Beach seniors hiking group tackles alpine trails

Annual trip involves taking helicopter to remote locations

Parksville asks for help identifying veterans for special banner project

Program to honour veterans whose names are listed on Parksville cenotaph

QUIZ: Do you know the truth?

In what has been described as a post-truth era, how much do you know about truth and lies?

NHL playoffs: Canucks to meet St. Louis Blues in Round 1

Vancouver takes on defending champs beginning Wednesday

Process begins to try to get lookout trail over Nanoose Bay authorized

Regional District of Nanaimo staff will report back to parks and trails committee

Simon Cowell breaks his back falling from electric bike

Incident happened at his home in California

Poetry contest started for Vancouver Island poets

“We’re such a unique group,” says founder on why she wanted to start the collective

Unofficial holidays: the weird and wonderful things people celebrate around the world

On any given day of the year, there are several strange, silly or serious holidays to observe

Island MP says fish harvester benefit needs a wider application window

Courtenay-Alberni’s Gord Johns requests expanded application period for fish harvester benefits

Missing teen visiting Courtenay found safe

She had last been seen going for a walk on Aug. 6

Moving on: Tanev scores 11 seconds into OT as Canucks oust Wild

Vancouver beats Minnesota 5-4 to move into first round of NHL playoffs

Most Read